Shevchenko V.G., Nosal D.A. Improvement of procedure for hazards identification and risk assessment on coal mines

Geoteh. meh. 2020, 151, 63-76

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/geotm2020.151.063

Improvement of procedure for hazards identification and risk assessment on coal mines

1Shevchenko V.G., 2Nosal D.A.

1Institute of Geotechnical Mechanics named by N. Poljakov of NAS of Ukraine, 2«DTEK Energy» LLC

UDC 622.8.012.2:658.382.3

Language: Russian

Abstract.

A procedure for the identification of hazards and risk assessment, which determines the procedure for identifying hazards and assessing the risks of enterprise activity in the field of labor protection has been developed. The procedure was implemented at the enterprises of the Coal Business Unit of DTEK ENERGO LLC. It was established that the risk of injury is determined both by the adopted mining technology as a whole, and by the specific features of the main and auxiliary processes and operations that are characteristic of each particular mine, which in turn are also determined by the individual characteristics of miners. Only in 4 cases (17 %) did the priority of the risk assessment not coincide with the actual cases of injuries. This indicator can serve as a criterion for the accuracy of determining the priority of risk assessment by an expert group. The priority of risk assessment for a given technological operation must be adjusted taking into account the actual incidents of injuries. An analysis of risk assessment cards indicates that 88 % of injuries occurred during normal operation and only 12 % as a result of an emergency. The probability of injury and, accordingly, the risk during normal operation is higher than in an emergency. This must be considered when assessing the consequences of risk. The distribution of the number of sources by various types of danger showed that 31 % of the sources of danger relate to the collapse of the rock mass, 15 % – to the collapse of objects, materials, 12 % – to explosions or fires, and 8 % – to flying objects and moving equipment. For such a hazard as “collapse of the rock mass”, for which the largest number of sources of danger and injuries were recorded, the risk is at the same or even lower level as for hazard types with a small number of sources (injuries). It is advisable to adjust the risk, first of all, its probability, taking into account the actual cases of injuries. It is also necessary to expand the ranges of probability estimation and consider it as a continuous value that changes, for example, from 0 to 100 %. Recommendations on improving the procedure for hazard identification and risk assessment in coal mines are given.

Keywords:

labor protection, coal mine, hazard identification, risk assessment, procedure, consequences, probability, sources and types of danger, technology, individual characteristics of miners

References:

1.   The official site of Ministry of energy and environmental protection of Ukraine (2020), “Generalized analytical information based on the annual reports of the Ministry of Energy and Coal on the state of labor protection for 2018. Coal-industrial complex”, available at: http://mpe.kmu.gov.ua/minugol/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=245349333&cat_id=245293173 (Accessed 25 February 2020).

2.   Research Institute of Metrology of Measuring and Control Systems (2015), DSTU ISO 9001:2015 (ISO 9001:2015, IDT) Systemy upravlinnia yakistiu [ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems – Requirements], SE “UkrNDNC”, Kiev, Ukraine.

3.   Ukrainian Research and Training Center of Standardization, Certification and Quality (2010), DSTU OHSAS 18001:2010 Systemy upravlinnia hihiienoiu ta bezpekoiu pratsi. Vymohy [SSTU OHSAS 18001:2010 Hygiene and safety management systems. Requirements], SE “UkrNDNC”, Kiev, Ukraine.

4.   International Standards Office (2018), ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems – Requirements with guidance for use, ISO/TC 283, London, UK.

5.   Shevchenko, V.G. and Nosal, D.A. (2018), “Procedure for hazards identification and risk assessment at labor safety”, Geo-Technical Mechanics, no. 141, pp. 190-203.
https://doi.org/10.15407/geotm2018.141.190

About the authors:

ShevchenkoVolodymyr Heorhiiovych, Doctor of Technical Sciences (D.Sc.), Professor, Scientific Secretary of the Institute, Institute of Geotechnical Mechanics named by N. Poljakov of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, Dnipro, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Nosal Dmytro Oleksandrovych, Master of Science, Manager of the Department of Labor Protection and Industrial Safety of the Coal Mining Directorate, DTEK Energy LLC, Pavlograd, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.