Gunchenko O. M., Belikov A.S., Kasyanov M.A., Shalomov V.A., Stefanovich P.I. Method of estimates of industrial risk

 

Geoteh. meh. 2016, 127, 127-140

 METHOD OF ESTIMATES OF INDUSTRIAL RISK

1Gunchenko O. M., 2Belikov A.S., 3Kasyanov M.A., 2Shalomov V.A., 2Stefanovich P.I.

1State University of telecommunications, Kiev, 2SHEI “PSACEA”, 3National University of construction and architecture, Kiev 

UDC 69.05: 658.382

Abstract. The expedience of the use of multidimensional model of analysis of terms of labour on the basis of distributing on weight of parameters of present harmful and dangerous production factors on two canonical sizes – on units of measuring and their stakes to maximum possible concentrations, for estimation of production risk, is grounded. Possibility at research and estimation of production risk to take into account the terms of labour in concrete production with pointing of the actual measurings (or the calculation values got on the stage of planning) of parameters of concrete factors characteristic for him, by translation of them from existent units of measuring in gravimetric stakes is maximum possible concentrations and determination of their weight in canonical sizes is got. Such approach to methodology of estimation of production risk provides implementation of the requirements, represented in the State sanitary norms and rules «Hygienical job classification on the indexes of harmfulness and danger of factors of production environment, weight and tension of labour process», that hygienical estimation of occupational take must be conducted tak ing into account the size of display of these factors, indexes of the state of health of worker and loss by him ability to work.
Keywords: risk, probability, harmful and dangerous production factors, mathematical model, method, refusals.

REFERENCES

1. Bagrov A. V. and Murtazov A. K. (2010), Tehnogennye sistemy i teorija riska [Man-made systems and risk theory], Rjazanskij gos. un-t im. S.A. Yesenina, Ryazan, RU.
2. Bondar Ye. A. (2010), «On the methods of assessment ppofessionalnogo piska and ways to improve them», Bezopasnost zhiznedeyatelnosti, no. 3 (111), pp. 31-35.
3. Galljamova Je. I. (2016), «Evaluation of operational risks as a security management method in the oil and gas industry» [Electronical resource], Neftegazovoye delo:elektronny nauchny zhurnal, no. 3, pp. 293-306. Available at: http://ogbus.ru/issues/3_2016/ ogbus_3_2016_p293-306_Gallyamova E I_ru.pdf.
4. Zhivetin V. B. (2008), Vvedenie v analiz riska. Riski i bezopasnost chelovecheskoy deyatelnosti [Introduction to risk analysis. Risks and safety of human activity], Inform.– izd. centr «BonAnca», Moscow, RU.
5. Zaharenkov V. V. Surzhikov D. V. and Oleshhenko A. M. (2014), «The use of multivariate analysis for risk assessment in the working environment», Sovremenniye naukoyomkiye tehnologii, no. 1, pp. 62-65.
6. Imasheva A. O. (2013), «Mathematical modeling in the management of occupational safety and health», Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gos. un-ta, no. 2 (24), pp. 283-287.
7. Kas'janov M. A., Medjanyk V. O., Gunchenko O. M. and Pronina Ju. G. (2015), «Improving methods of hazard analysis and production risk», Construction, materials science, mechanical engineering, PDABA, Dnepropetrovsk, no. 84, pp. 130-139.
8. Min'ko V. M. (2002), Matematicheskoye modelirovaniye v upravlenii okhranoy truda [Mathematical modeling in the management of occupational safety and health], FGUNPP «Jantarnyj skaz», Kaliningrad, RU.
9. R 2.2.1766-03. Rukovodstvo po ocenke professionalnogo riska dlya zdorovya rabotnikov. Organizacionno-metodicheskiye osnovy, principy i kriterii ocenki [Guidance on occupational risk assessment guide for workers' health. Organizational-methodical bases, principles and criteria of job evaluation] (2003), Izd-vo standartov, Moscow, RU.
10. R 2.2.2006-05 Rukovodstvo po gigienicheskoyj ocenke faktorov rabocheyj sredy i trudovogo processa. Kriterii i klassifikaciyja usloviyj truda [Guidance on the hygienic assessment of factors of working environment and labor process. The criteria and classification of working conditions] (2005), Izd-vo standartov, Moscow, RU.

About the authors:

Gunchenko Oksana Mikolayivna, Candidate of Technical Sciences, associate professor in State University of telecommunications, associate professor Department of physical education and labor protection, Kiev, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Belikov Anatoliy Serafimovich, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Life Safety Department in State Higher Education Institution «Pridneprovsk State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture» (PSACEA), Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Kasyanov Mykola Anatoliyovych, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Labor Protection and the Environment in National University of Construction and Architecture, Kiev, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Shalomov Volodymyr Anatoliyovych, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Life Safety Department in State Higher Education Institution «Pridneprovsk State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture» (PSACEA), Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Stefanovych Pavlo Ivanovych, Master of Science, Assistant of Department of Labor Protection and the Environment  in  National  University  of  Construction  and Architecture, Kiev, Ukraine, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .